Next to music and my dogs, my biggest obsession is cars. I’ve always been a car nut. I’m one of those people with a list of cars I’ll buy when i win the lottery…

I’ll start with production sports cars. A Porsche 911 Turbo 4 will be my daily driver, although there will be a Lamborghini Uris SUV for those times I need to haul people and stuff. For those summer days, I think a McLaren 750s Spider would be cool.

I’ll need a car for track days, of course. No one else in the neighbourhood would have a Koenigsegg. I’d probably order the Jekso Absolute (1600 horsepower sounds about right.)

And just to show everyone that I’m not out to completely destroy the planet, there will be at least one EV. Right now, that would be a Rimac Nevera.

That’s what? Four million dollars’ worth of vehicles? Not including insurance and maintenance, of course. I’m never going to win that kind of lottery, but it’s nice to dream.

For other people, though, this is the kind of machinery sitting in their air-conditioned, highly secure underground garages. That includes a lot of rock stars.

Eric Clapton is so well-known at Ferrari that the company built him a custom one-of-a-kind model that probably cost him upward of five million. Neil Peart had a selection of very collectible sports cars from the 1960s, all in silver.

Brian Johnson of AC/DC has a bunch of Bentleys, Ferraris, and some classic race cars. Same with Nick Mason of Pink Floyd. He’s even written a book about this collection.

Then there’s everything we use in the car to listen to music. Radio, car audio, satellite radio, infotainment systems, and all that.

All this got me thinking about the relationship between cars and rock. The two things go hand-in-hand. We should look at this history, yeah?

Songs heard on this show:

• Jonathan Richman, Roadrunner
• Coldplay, Speed of Sound
• Jackie Brenston and his Delta Cats, Rocket 88
• Weezer, We Are All on Drugs
• Greta Van Fleet, Highway Tune
• Foo Fighters, Something from Nothing
• The Clash, Brand New Cadillac
• Blink-182, The Rock Show
• Jamiroquai, Black Devil Car
• Joy Division, Love Will Year Us Apart

Eric Wilhite has his usual playlist.

The Ongoing History of New Music can be heard on the following stations:

• 102.1 The Edge/Toronto – Sunday night at 7pm
• Q107/Toronto – Sunday night at 8pm
• Live 88-5/Ottawa – Saturdays at 9am and Sundays at 6pm.
• 107.5 Dave-FM/Kitchener – Sunday nights at 11pm
• FM96/London – Sunday nights at 8pm
• Power 97/Winnipeg – Sunday nights at 11pm
• Sonic 102.9/Edmonton – Sunday at 8am and 8pm
• The Zone/Victoria – Sunday at 8am and 9pm
• The Fox/Vancouver – Sunday at 11pm
• Surge 105/Halifax – Sunday at 7pm
• WAPS/WKTL The Summit/Arkon, Canton, Cleveland, Youngstown – Mon-Fri at 9pm
• We’re still looking for more affiliates in Calgary, Kamloops, Kelowna, Regina, Saskatoon, Brandon, Windsor,  Montreal, Halifax, Charlottetown, Moncton, Fredericton, and St John’s and anywhere else with a transmitter. If you’re in any of those markets and you want the show, lemme know and I’ll see what I can do.

© 2026 Corus Radio, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

You might not have heard his name, but you’ve heard his machine. Japanese engineer Ikutaro Kakehashi passed away in April 2017. He was a founder of Roland, the music electronics company, and the inventor of the ubiquitous Roland TR-808 drum machine.

The 808 has cemented its place in music history and pops up on a wide variety of tracks, from Marvin Gaye’s “Sexual Healing” to Kanye’s entire 808s and Heartbreaks album.  But the machine almost died early.

The 808 was originally released in 1980 as a cheaper alternative to fancier machines. But cheaper parts meant less memory and more electronic sounds, which critics did not like. The 808 was pulled from shelves only three years later, but saw a resurgence thanks to underground producers in the worlds of techno-pop, hip hop, dance and techno. Used machines were selling for only a couple hundred dollars, and the interface was super easy to program. It didn’t take long for the 808 to start showing up everywhere.

© 2026 Corus Radio, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

Inspiration oftentimes comes from unexpected places and the story of co-producer Guy Stevens’ mad genius in the making of The Clash’s London Calling fits the bill.

The Clash turned to Stevens to return them to their rock and roll roots for their third album, London Calling. CBS Records, on the other hand, was appalled that the band had chosen such an unconventional and substance-abusing guy. And sure enough, when the time came to begin recording at Wessex studios in August of 1979, he showed up with two bottles of tequila, and the mayhem began.

The Clash loved Stevens’ antics: shouting in faces, wrestling for control of the board, knocking down stacks of chairs, throwing a ladder at guitarist Mick Jones during a solo, and pouring beer into numerous pieces of equipment. Ultimately, Stevens was more interested in capturing emotions rather than fiddling with knobs and dials. Something about grabbing them by the throats and screaming instructions really elevated The Clash’s performance.

It worked. London Calling is a certified classic.

© 2026 Corus Radio, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

Winter lashes out again with freezing rain and winter storm warnings in effect for much of southern Québec.

Environment Canada has forecast significant ice buildup between Ottawa, Gatineau, Montreal and Québec City, with 20 to 40 millimetres of freezing rain expected over a potential 24-hour period.

The weather agency says the accumulating ice has the potential to disrupt travel, cause power outages and damage property due to its weight.

Meanwhile, in the Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean region, winter storm conditions are expected, including strong winds, snow and ice pellets.

Roughly 30 to 40 centimetres of accumulation is expected through Wednesday, into Thursday evening.

As of 3:30 Wednesday morning, Hydro-Québec was already reporting that almost 9,000 addresses were without power.

© 2026 The Canadian Press

Five gun control advocacy groups have told the RCMP they’re “alarmed and disappointed” the force has not yet disclosed basic information about the models and legal status of the firearms used in the Tumbler Ridge, B.C., mass shooting.

The RCMP has responded by saying the information is subject to an active investigation, meaning the force doesn’t know when the details will be available.

In a letter sent Tuesday to RCMP Commissioner Mike Duheme, the groups say “there is no discernible reason” not to immediately disclose the information, which they say could help strengthen public safety and prevent more shootings.

The letter is signed by Heidi Rathjen of the group PolySeSouvient, with the support of representatives of Angie’s Angels, Canadian Doctors for Protection Against Guns, Danforth Families for Safe Communities and the Quebec Mosque.

The Feb. 10 shootings at a school and home in Tumbler Ridge left nine people dead, including the young assailant, and many others injured.

The letter says the RCMP’s reputation and public trust were significantly damaged by the force’s handling of the 2020 Nova Scotia mass shooting.

They note that among the RCMP’s failures cited in the Mass Casualty Commission’s final report into the Nova Scotia shootings was an institutional mindset that “undervalues community relationships.”

“We urge you and all members of the RCMP to demonstrate that the lessons learned from Nova Scotia are being applied to the Tumbler Ridge investigation, that is, by being transparent with the public about the guns used in this school shooting — information Canadians expect and deserve,” the letter says.

The groups also want to know when the RCMP will release what it knows about the legal status and source of the guns used in the B.C. shooting.

Details related to a previous seizure of firearms from the family home of the shooter, and the justifications for returning them, “are also of great interest to the victims’ families and the public,” the letter adds.

“Releasing verified information now — at the very least regarding the firearms used — will strengthen citizens’ trust and confidence in the RCMP,” it reads.

In its response to the letter Tuesday, the RCMP’s B.C. division said the police investigation will conclude “only once all investigative avenues have been exhausted and the evidence suggests there are no additional leads to follow.”

“It’s impossible to provide a specific or detailed timeline as it is subject to the gathering of all digital and physical evidence and any analysis,” the response added.

The Mounties said they were also mindful of the recent announcement of a coroner’s inquest into the shooting and await “further information around time, location and scope.”

PolySeSouvient told The Canadian Press that gun control advocacy organizations are in no way calling for the RCMP to rush its investigation.

“All we are asking for is the release of basic information, like the models of firearms used, that could help prevent future mass shootings,” the group said.

“Transparency is needed to inform policy debates, like what type of guns and accessories should not be legally available for ordinary citizens.”

© 2026 The Canadian Press

It’s time for another look at the greatest contract riders in history.  The rider is the part of the deal that the promoter strikes with a performer over what will be supplied to the artist on the day of the show.  It’s supposed to cover everything from the nature of the load-in of the equipment to–and this is the interesting part–what needs to be supplied to the artist backstage in the dressing room.

Here’s what Iggy Pop once requested in an 18-page rider:

• A copy of USA Today
• Seven dwarfs dressed up as the characters in Snow White
• Something unmentionable about morbidly obese people
• And a Bob Hope impersonator to “perform jokes about golf, Hollywood and Bing Crosby.”  Iggy is a big golfer, but I had no idea he liked to warm up for a gig this way.  Or so he says.

To be clear, he wasn’t serious. He included these points in his rider to make sure the promoter actually read the thing.

© 2026 Corus Radio, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

The Curator independently decides what topics and products we feature. When you purchase an item through our links, we may earn a commission. Promotions and products are subject to availability and retailer terms.

With the days getting longer and patio season (finally!) on the horizon, it’s time to talk SPF. If there’s one skincare step dermatologists universally agree on, it’s sunscreen. Daily SPF is the ultimate skin protector, shielding against premature aging, hyperpigmentation and skin damage caused by both UVA (aging) and UVB (burning) rays. And yes, UV rays can still penetrate through clouds and windows.

Today’s formulas are also more sophisticated than ever. From lightweight gels to hydrating creams and portable sticks, they blend seamlessly into your routine while delivering broad-spectrum protection. You’ll also see two main categories: mineral sunscreens, which use ingredients like zinc oxide or titanium dioxide to sit on top of skin and reflect UV rays, and chemical sunscreens, which absorb UV radiation and convert it into heat before it damages the skin. Both are effective–it simply comes down to skin type and preference.

For everyday wear, dermatologists generally recommend SPF 30 or higher, though SPF 50 offers extra insurance for long outdoor days. When choosing a formula, consider your skin type (hydrating formulas for dry skin, oil-free options for acne-prone complexions), finish (tinted, matte or invisible) and application style (lotions, sticks or mineral blends). From glow-boosting protection by Supergoop! to a dermatologist-favourite option from La Roche-Posay and a skin-firming SPF from Dermalogica, here are some of the best face sunscreens to try in 2026.

 

What to look for in a face sunscreen

For everyday protection: Choose a broad-spectrum SPF 30 or higher to defend against both UVA and UVB rays. Lightweight lotions, gels and fluid formulas work well under makeup for daily wear.

For sensitive skin: Mineral sunscreens with zinc oxide or titanium dioxide are typically gentler and less likely to cause irritation. Fragrance-free formulas are also a safer bet.

For acne-prone skin: Look for non-comedogenic, oil-free sunscreens that won’t clog pores. Ingredients like niacinamide can help calm redness and regulate oil production.

For dry skin: Hydrating sunscreens formulated with hyaluronic acid, glycerin or ceramides help replenish moisture while protecting against sun damage.

For makeup wearers: Tinted sunscreens and sheer formulas double as complexion boosters while providing sun protection—perfect for minimal makeup days.

For active days: Water-resistant formulas help maintain protection during workouts, swimming or hot, humid weather.

 

Best anti-aging

Think of this sunscreen as your moisturizer, anti-aging treatment and SPF in one. The rich, cream-like texture feels nourishing on skin while delivering broad-spectrum SPF 50 protection. Antioxidant-rich white tea and peptides help support firmness and defend against environmental stressors. It’s a smart choice for anyone looking to streamline their morning routine with a formula that protects and treats at the same time.[/product_listing]

 

Best for sensitive skin

If your skin tends to react to traditional sunscreen formulas, this gentle mineral option offers reliable protection without irritation. Zinc oxide provides broad-spectrum coverage while the lightweight lotion blends more easily than many mineral SPFs, helping reduce the chalky look that can sometimes come with physical sunscreens. Bonus: The fragrance-free formula feels comfortable and breathable, even on delicate or reactive skin.[/product_listing]

 

Best for acne-prone skin

A cult favourite among dermatologists, this lightweight sunscreen is formulated for breakout-prone skin–but it works beautifully for all skin types. Oil-free and non-comedogenic, it delivers high SPF protection while absorbing quickly into the skin, leaving a breathable finish that won’t clog pores or trigger shine. It’s also designed to disappear seamlessly across a variety of skin tones with no white cast.[/product_listing]

 

Best hydrating

At under $20, this sunscreen proves you don’t need to splurge for great SPF. Inspired by the brand’s cult-favourite Hydro Boost moisturizer, the formula has a refreshing water-gel texture that feels cool and lightweight on the skin. It sinks in quickly, delivers hydration and leaves behind a smooth, comfortable finish that’s so lightweight it doesn’t feel like you’re wearing it.[/product_listing]

 

You may also like:

Women’s Sun Straw Hat Wide Brim – $36.99

Ray-Ban Unisex’s Rb4420 Sunglasses – $192

Women’s Long Sleeve Shirts UPF 50+  – $19.99

 

Best tinted

Part skincare, part complexion perfector, this tinted sunscreen provides sheer coverage while helping protect against sun damage. Hyaluronic acid adds a boost of hydration while the universal tint subtly evens out tone. Hot tip: On low-maintenance days, apply this in place of foundation and spot-conceal where needed. The subtle tint helps even tone while still letting natural skin show through for a “your skin but better” look.[/product_listing]

 

Best mineral-based

Prefer a mineral formula but dislike the heavy feel? This mattifying SPF uses zinc oxide to reflect UV rays while maintaining a smooth, shine-controlling finish. Fragrance-free and designed for daily wear, it’s a solid pick for those who want a breathable mineral sunscreen.[/product_listing]

 

Best for face & body

This lightweight chemical sunscreen is designed for daily wear and long days outdoors. It absorbs quickly, blends effortlessly into skin and delivers high SPF protection without leaving behind a white cast, making it a reliable go-to for both face and body.[/product_listing]

 

Best water-resistant

Heading outdoors? This durable sunscreen is designed to stay put through sweat, swimming and hot summer days. Despite its long-wearing protection, the formula remains lightweight and comfortable enough for everyday use.[/product_listing]

 

Best dewy

This viral glow-boosting sunscreen delivers protection and luminosity in one step. The lightweight moisturizer provides broad-spectrum SPF 50 while niacinamide helps visibly smooth and even skin tone over time. Subtle light-reflecting micas create a soft, dewy sheen you’ll love.[/product_listing]

 

Best sunscreen stick

Sun protection on the go has never been easier. This portable SPF stick glides smoothly over skin, delivering invisible protection without disturbing makeup–and it’s completely invisible across all skin tones. Perfect for mid-day reapplication, it’s a handbag-friendly essential for sunny commutes and travel.[/product_listing]

 

You may also like:

Sun Visor – $9.49

Marc Anthony Anti-Frizz Shield Ultimate Blowout Spray – $13.38

Burt’s Bees Tinted Lip Balm SPF 30 – $9.49

© 2026 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

As U.S. President Donald Trump’s trade war against Canada stretches into its second year, more than half of Americans said in an Angus Reid survey that they don’t want any tariffs on Canada, with the majority viewing their northern neighbour positively.

With the Canada-U.S.-Mexico (CUSMA) free trade agreement up for renegotiation this year, 51 per cent of U.S. respondents told the survey that if they had their way, there would be no tariffs on Canada at all.

This is up compared to October 2024, in the middle of Trump’s campaign to return to the White House, when less than half of respondents (48 per cent) said they didn’t want any tariffs on Canada.

Among those who identified as registered Democrats, this figure was at 72 per cent. MAGA Republicans are more likely to want a tariff on Canada, but 48 per cent said they would only want a “minor” tariff on Canada.

The survey, which was held among a representative randomized sample of 1,529 American adults, found that nearly half (48 per cent) want to keep CUSMA as is while another 23 per cent said they would want the U.S. to negotiate separate trade deals with Canada and Mexico.

Nearly two-thirds (63 per cent) of Americans said Trump’s tariffs are mostly borne by American consumers (56 per cent) or businesses (seven per cent).

While Trump has said Canada is “one of the worst” countries to trade with, nearly three quarters of Americans (73 per cent) said they have a favourable view of their neighbour to the north.

More than half (52 per cent) even said Canada was the “the most important” or “a very important” trading partner to the U.S.

This contrasts with Canadians’ views of their southern neighbours, with 39 per cent seeing the U.S. as “an enemy” or a “potential threat” and only 22 per cent thinking of the U.S. as being on friendly terms with Canada or being an ally.

Last year, polling conducted by Ipsos exclusively for Global News found that six in 10 Canadians (60 per cent) say they can never trust the Americans the same way ever again.

The poll also found that found that 42 per cent of Canadians said they believe Prime Minister Mark Carney will succeed in negotiating a new trade deal with the Trump administration.

© 2026 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

It was early June when representatives of the Ford government’s home care agency penned an increasingly frustrated and urgent legal letter to one of its vendors.

Weeks after a ransomware attack, officials were still trying to work out how many Ontarians had been impacted.

“Just want to reiterate the urgency around the numbers,” a representative of Ontario Health atHome wrote in an email on June 9, 2025.

“We really need to understand our actual exposure (not the potential exposure). Anything you and your client can do to expedite and provide this information sooner rather than later would be appreciated.”

Two months earlier, the company — Ontario Medical Supply (OMS) — had informed Ontario Health atHome its systems had been breached.

The breach would turn out to be a ransomware attack which impacted some 200,000 home care patients in Ontario. A government report suggests OMS ultimately paid the ransom demanded to get access to its servers again.

Despite not knowing for weeks how many patients were impacted, the Ministry of Health did not reveal the cyberattack until an Ontario Liberal MPP sounded the alarm in late June 2025.

Before that, hundreds of pages of internal emails and reports, obtained by Global News using freedom of information laws, reveal a tense scramble to see what data had been compromised and what should be done.

The documents show ransomware likely accessed servers used by OMS without being noticed in mid-March 2025, remaining dormant for a month before it triggered its “payload” on April 13.

When the malware was activated, it locked a “significant portion” of the company’s servers, demanding a payment to return access.

The day after the attack, OMS told Ontario Health atHome it had suffered a breach and was taking steps to address it. The messages suggest that, initially at least, the breach was not seen as a major risk.

At one point, a note from OMS said that, “based on the controls that are in place, we have assessed the risk to Ontario Health and provisional healthcare services as low.”

Days after being told about the attack, Ontario Health atHome started asking questions.

According to a letter from its lawyers, the agency requested details of the attack. OMS told them it would only answer if “questions were put in writing.”

For more than two weeks after the attack took place, it appears neither OMS nor Ontario Health atHome thought personal health records had been accessed. Then, in early May, OMS confirmed public health information “may have been exfiltrated.”

The first disclosure that patient information could have been involved came on May 6. It wasn’t until May 21, according to the letter and the provincial government, that OMS confirmed public health data was definitely taken.

Even after learning that patient data had been impacted, OMS appeared to remain comfortable that the situation was under control.

“We are confident that this threat has been contained and eradicated, and that we now have exceptional security safeguards in place, providing excellent visibility and protection,” an email from its CEO to Ontario Health atHome explained.

Officials at the agency pushed back, asking for specifics on how many patients had potentially had their data stolen and their identities, so they could be contacted.

“It is difficult to pinpoint exact patients, but we do know that files containing basic patient data would have been compromised,” OMS’ CEO wrote on May 23. “Our estimate is that the number impacted is 200,000. We don’t believe we will get to a more precise figure.”

The back-and-forth continued for weeks. From the moment the attack was disclosed, OMS had been kept out of Ontario Health atHome’s systems, as cybersecurity staff worked to see if it was safe to reconnect the vendor.

The emails obtained by Global News come from the government agency and chronicle its internal frustration with how OMS appeared to be handling the cyberattack. Snippets suggest the company was also struggling with Ontario Health atHome’s response.

On June 11, the CEO of OMS wrote to Ontario Health atHome to complain that his company had “provided all the necessary remedial work” after the ransomware attack, and not being able to integrate with the government’s systems was hurting patient care.

“Does the leadership of OHaH understand that your IT is requiring that we provide information on stockouts and similar notifications as a critical item to reconnection when we haven’t been able to provide this since April 13th?” the CEO wrote in an email.

The letter from Ontario Health atHome’s lawyers, sent two days after the reconnection complaint, said the agency still had no real idea of how many patients were impacted.

“To date, and despite multiple requests on the part of OHaH, OMS has failed to provide a breakdown of the ‘approximately 200,000′ individuals affected by the Incident, including the number of OHaH patients impacted, and/or any other details about the specific personal information and/or (personal health information) that has been compromised,” an extract read.

The breach was revealed two weeks later by Ontario Liberal MPP Adil Shamji.

To date, the government has still not offered a more detailed figure than 200,000 patients. The value of the ransom also remains unknown.

OMS did not respond to questions ahead of this story, while the Ministry of Health did not address Global News’ questions in a statement.

© 2026 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

MONTREAL – Craig Berube liked what he saw — in most of the final 40 minutes.

The first period, meanwhile, looked far more like the version of the Toronto Maple Leafs that has them staring down a lengthy losing streak and a first missed trip to the playoffs since 2016.

The Montreal Canadiens jumped out to a 2-0 lead en route to a 3-1 win over their Original Six rivals Tuesday night, extending Toronto’s winless skid to eight games.

“They outskated us and had the play in the first period,” Leafs coach Berube said. “I thought we did a much better job in the second period, got ourselves back in the game. We just need more.

“We just needed more of a push from a lot of guys.”

The Canadiens dominated early, toying with the Leafs in the offensive zone to hold a 15-8 edge in shots after 20 minutes.

Zachary Bolduc saw an early chance go wide and Kaiden Guhle ripped a shot off Joseph Woll’s mask before Oliver Kapanen opened the scoring less than five minutes in, finishing a slick passing play with Ivan Demidov and Alex Newhook with a deke from the goal line.

Montreal kept pressing until Phillip Danault capitalized on a fortuitous bounce to make it 2-0 at 14:41, as Guhle’s dump-in ricocheted off the glass and landed on the veteran centre’s stick for his fifth of the season.

“They definitely had the play in the first for sure, had the puck,” Berube said. “We didn’t check it off of them and then when we did, we didn’t do anything with the puck. Didn’t get up the ice as a five-man unit and create anything. We had five shots on net and a couple chances, but not enough.”

Toronto pushed back in the second period with William Nylander cutting into the lead after a give-and-go with Easton Cowan during a strong stretch in the second period, but Montreal shut the game down in the third — with help from two Leafs penalties in the final nine minutes.

Nylander said although the push back may be encouraging, it’s still far from where the Maple Leafs need to be.

“It’s a lot of losses in a row now,” he said. “Parts of all the games we’ve been playing, we’ve been playing snippets of good hockey. And I mean, that’s not how we want to play when we play a full game of good hockey. So until we trend closer to that, I think (that’s when) it will be positive.

“They were kind of all over us. Sometimes that happens, teams are all over (you), but to give up that many chances to begin with, it’s kind of tough. Woll did a great job and kept us in the game all night.”

The Maple Leafs (27-27-11) fell 13 points outside the playoffs and 15 behind the Canadiens (35-18-10), who jumped to third in the Atlantic Division.

So why can’t Toronto put together a full game of “good hockey”?

“It’s tough to say, but it’s hard to win in this league if you don’t get it,” Berube said. “You don’t have to dominate a period, but you have to be in the game. You got to create and you got to defend.

“Throughout this stretch, there’s been a lot of good hockey, but then there’s that stretch of — if it’s a period or a 10-minute stretch in a period — where these teams score two, three goals on us.”

Berube then pointed out that the Leafs can’t score their way out of those lapses. Toronto captain Auston Matthews — a former 69-goal scorer — extended his goalless streak to 12 games on Tuesday.

“Right now, we can’t find the back of the net enough,” he said. “When this is going on, you got to keep the puck out of our net as much as possible, hopefully find our groove with the scoring, but we need more guys to dig in and contribute than there is right now.”

Over in the Canadiens dressing room, centre Jake Evans called the outing their “most complete game.”

“I felt the third period, we were in control for most of it,” he said. “We just didn’t get that third or maybe even fourth goal to take them out of it, and they fought hard to battle back.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published March 11, 2026.

© 2026 The Canadian Press