The Ongoing History of New Music, episode 1088: A timeline of technological advances in music

This probably won’t come as a shock, but I’m something of a nerd when it comes to technology. Yeah, I like gadgets and devices and toys and machines that go “ping,” but I’m especially interested in the tech that affects music—and vice versa.

Back around 2013, I got involved with a company that created a touring museum exhibit that went to science centres around North America. The owner of the company came up with the idea when he heard an “Ongoing History” program called “Format Wars,” which looked at all the different ways music was captured, stored, and distributed: vinyl, tape, CDs, and so on.

We called the exhibit “The Science of Rock’n’Roll,” and it explored how science and music have influenced each other, not just over the years, but over the centuries. The two things go hand in hand, each affecting the other and providing ways for creativity to expand into directions that were once thought impossible.

The exhibit did okay, too, booking runs at science centres in Toronto, Boston, Kansas City, Detroit, Cleveland, and a few other markets.

“The Science of Rock” spun off into a children’s book I co-wrote called “The Science of Song.” It’s aimed at kids 13 and under and STEM teaching: science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.

It’s been a minute since the book, the museum exhibit, and that original “Format Wars” show, so I thought it might be time to revisit the subject. And with that in mind, here’s a timeline of the biggest technological advances in music.

Prepare to geek out.

Songs heard on this show:

  • Beck, Where It’s At
  • Bjork, Headphones
  • The Kills, Tape Song
  • Kraftwerk, The Model
  • SSQ, Walkman On
  • Red Hot Chili Peppers, Give It Away
  • Evanescence, Bring Me to Life
  • Sarah McLachlan, Building a Mystery

Here’s Eric Wilhite’s playlist.
The Ongoing History of New Music can be heard on these stations:

© 2026 Corus Radio, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

Ongoing History Daily: The weird Hollerado fan album

Hollerado is a weirdly creative bunch of guys. Take the case of their album, 111 Songs.

Someone in the group came up with the idea of writing a song for every fan who wrote in and asked for one. The initial concept was to release a special promotional bundle with the record, a T-shirt, a poster and a custom song that would go with their second album, White Paint. Fantastic.

But so many fans wrote in—more than a hundred people paid to be a part of this—that the project took two years to complete. The result is equivalent to more than five full-length albums and was finally released on March 24, 2015. Hollerado went to iTunes who then refused to sell a five-hour collection for nine dollars.

The band wouldn’t compromise—Apple wanted to sell it for $35—so the 111 Songs album has gone down in Hollerado history as a fantastic money-losing passion project.

© 2026 Corus Radio, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

Ongoing History Daily: The making of Nirvana's Unplugged

On November 18, 1993, Nirvana went to Sony Music Studios in New York to perform an unplugged gig for MTV.  It was broadcast on TV and turned into a CD that came out after Kurt Cobain died. At first, MTV and the band’s label thought it was going to be a disaster because Nirvana insisted on playing some of the band’s more obscure stuff along with a couple of covers.

Kurt refused outright to do “Smells Like Teen Spirit,” which freaked everyone out.  There were also concerns about Kurt’s health because he was going through withdrawal and vomiting blood.  Only a standby supply of Valium kept things on the rails.

At the end of the day, though, it was a magnificent performance.  Unplugged in New York is available in its full form on DVD and Blu-ray.  If you’re a Nirvana fan, it’s definitely worth it.

© 2026 Corus Radio, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

Ongoing History Daily: Music has never been cheaper

Think buying music is too expensive? If you look at things from a historical point of view, music has never, ever been cheaper.

If you go back to the 1950s, the average price of an album was about $5.50–and that’s in 1950s dollars. If you adjust for inflation, that’s over 60 bucks today.  Single digital albums sell for around 10 dollars on iTunes today. A CD certainly goes for less than 20. In the 70s, a 7-inch single sold for between 99 cents and $1.29. Adjust that for inflation, and that’s equivalent to over $7.50 at the high end.

Today on iTunes, singles go for between 69 and a buck twenty-nine. Talk about DEflation.  And that’s for physical and digital product. When you look at the free streaming from Spotify and YouTube, music costs nothing.

So, is it worth less or worthless? That’s where the discussion gets interesting.

© 2026 Corus Radio, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

Uncharted: Crime and Mayhem in the Music Industry, episode 074: The mysterious death of Bobby Fuller

The cops reported it as a suicide, another musician who had washed out of the business and took his own life. Sad, but common stuff. The police had seen it all before.

There was a quick investigation, a report was filed, and the case was closed.

That was 1966. Was it really such a cut-and-dried situation? Why were there smears of blood around the victim’s mouth? Why was the body covered in bruises?

The man was known as an immaculate dresser. The clothes on the body were not only rumpled and messed up, but soaked with gasoline.

The car in which the body was found wasn’t there 30 minutes before it was discovered. And if death had come so recently, why was it already displaying signs of rigor mortis?

None of this made sense. The musician and his band had recently had a major hit record that reached the Top 10. He seemed to have been in good spirits. There was no suicide note. So how did he end up dead, parked in front of his apartment in his mother’s Oldsmobile?

This is Episode 74 of “Uncharted: Crime and Mayhem in the Music Industry.” And this time, it’s the story of the mysterious death of Bobby Fuller.
In addition to the podcasts, you can hear Uncharted on these Corus radio stations (all times local):

  • Toronto: AM 640 (4-5 am)
  • London: 980 CFPL (4-5 am)
  • Vancouver: 730 CKNW (1-2 am)
  • Edmonton: 630 CHED (1-2 am)
  • Calgary: QR77 (770 AM) (1-2 am)
  • Winnipeg: 680 CJOB (1-2 am)

And don’t forget about my current national speaking tour that will feature a live Uncharted podcast presentation. Get your tickets here.

© 2026 Corus Radio, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

Ongoing History Daily: “Mr. Brightside” is The Killers song that won’t die

“Mr. Brightside” was the first-ever single from The Killers. It was released on September 29, 2003, and in Britain, it has never, ever gone away.

It’s been on and off the British charts for ten years, making it the longest-charting single in the history of those charts. It has sold more than six million copies in the UK alone and has been played on the radio around eight million times.

Here’s what drummer Ronnie Vanucci had to say about the song: “It just goes. It’s like if you sing ‘Happy Birthday’ and you don’t think. It’s just ‘Happy Birthday’ now.” Are they bored playing it yet? Nope.

Brandon Flowers says, “I’m able to feed off of the excitement of somebody who’s there, hearing it for the first time. I still get a thrill. My concern is that it’s going to turn on us and there’s going to be a backlash, but it just keeps growing.”

© 2026 Corus Radio, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

Stelco to layoff hundreds at Hamilton steel plant, union estimates 350

Employees at the Hamilton steel plant run by Stelco Holdings Inc. will be laid off as the company plans to idle its finishing operations in the city.

Stelco said in a statement to Global News on Monday it was concentrating steel production at its Lake Erie Works plant in Haldimand, Ont.

The company said job opportunities at the Haldimand plant will be offered to laid off Hamilton workers.

“We expect that a significant number of employees affected by the infinite idle at Hamilton should be absorbed at Lake Erie Works,” the company said in a statement.

United Steelworkers Local 1005, which represents workers at the plant, told Global News it was told by the company that U.S. tariffs on steel, plus the lack of steel imports from other countries were behind the layoffs.

The union said the company informed it that about 500 production staff will be laid off. Union local president Ron Wells believes job losses will be closer to 350.

Wells said in an interview the company told the union that operations in the cold-mill and coated departments would be affected.

“It’s extremely devastating,” Wells said.

U.S. President Donald Trump levied tariffs on steel products from Canada of up to 50 per cent under its Section 232 duties about a year-and-a-half ago, with other products like aluminum and autos also facing tariffs.

Wells said that Stelco was citing the price for coated products was “very low” due to the ongoing tariffs.

“So they’re telling us they can’t make money in the current conditions,” he said.

Total tonnage of steel produced won’t be affected, according to Stelco, but there would be a change in product mix “with a higher concentration of hot rolled steel products.”

The counter-tariffs Prime Minister Mark Carney’s government has put in place, as well as the quotas on steel from foreign countries, aren’t “strong enough,” Wells said.

Hamilton East-Stoney Creek MP Ned Kuruc called the news “devastating.”

“Layoffs of 350 Hamilton steelworkers has been announced and will have a serious impact on workers, their families, and our entire community,” Kuruc wrote on X. “Hamilton is being hit hard by this ongoing trade dispute.”

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre also criticized the decision and called on Carney to take further action.

“The Prime Minister needs to turn his rhetoric into reality and deliver for steelworkers who cannot fill their gas tanks with signing ceremonies or pay their mortgages in speeches,” he wrote on X.

© 2026 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

Why gold and silver prices are on the decline as bond yields rise

Soaring U.S. debt is having an impact on global markets, including a surge in bond yields. Financial analyst, Robert Levy reports.

Global bond yields have been spiking in recent months amid geopolitical tension and economic uncertainty, including in the U.S., and these forces are also pushing down the perceived value of precious metals like gold and silver.

Bonds are loan products offered by governments and companies and the yield, or return investors can expect from holding the bond, fluctuates regularly based on economic factors as well as supply and demand for those products. Bonds return their full value at maturity (like repaying a loan), plus regular interest payments to the owner of the bond as payment for borrowing the money.

The higher yield for U.S. bonds especially is making metal assets less attractive, an investing expert says.

“The people who believe that precious metals are a store of value are now looking at 10-year, 20-year or 30-year bonds as, ‘wait a second, instead of holding something that doesn’t pay me an interest rate, I can hold something that does pay me an interest rate, and it’s a relatively good interest rate,'” says Colin White, president and CEO of Verecan Capital Management.

The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield was at about 5.25 per cent as of publication, up from about half a percentage point since last month, which is a relative increase of about 11 per cent.

At the same time, the price for gold on the December contract was hovering around US$4,164 per ounce, down more than eight per cent from a month ago. Silver on the December contract was about $61.55 an ounce, and also down about eight per cent from the same time last month.

These current movements in prices may suggest that bonds are more attractive as an investment than gold and silver, and even some stocks.

Traditionally, gold and other hard assets have been viewed by investors as a good option to park money and watch it grow in times of heightened financial risk. The theory here is that if a financial system or currency were to collapse, or if inflation was to spike out of control, then gold and similar hard assets would still hold most, if not all, of their value or more.

“We’ve had this huge run up to over $5,000 an ounce for gold, but now we’re down close to $4,000,” says White.

“That’s not behaving like a safe investment, that’s not behaving like a store of value or any kind of a safe thing, from what I would expect from something that is going to be a more consistent store of values.”

It isn’t always clear exactly why bond yields fluctuate, but a lot of the reason they rise has historically been tied to expectations about interest rates, inflation and risks from government spending.

The U.S. government has also reportedly spent over $25 billion so far on its war against Iran, as U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said last month, and the war has no clear end in sight. At the same time, global oil prices have skyrocketed because the conflict has led to a near-complete closure of the Strait of Hormuz shipping channel, which the Bank of Canada warned could lead to higher inflation the longer it persists.

Higher inflation not only makes goods and services more expensive, but it can also force central banks to raise their benchmark interest rates to help bring inflation down, which means higher borrowing costs for many consumers and businesses.

Expectations of rate hikes from central banks can also influence bond yields.

The U.S. Federal Reserve raised interest rates earlier this month for the first time in three years.

“If I’m sitting down making a decision with money, I can put it over here and get better than five per cent when I expect inflation to be around three, which means I’m net positive on holding a guaranteed investment, or I can buy something shiny and yellow that’s never going to pay me any distribution,” says White.

“The bond, it looks a little bit more attractive right now […] it’s absolutely changing the dynamics.”

© 2026 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

Trump says Canada 'entitled' as his trade ban on alcohol, other goods nears

U.S. import bans on select Canadian items are set to take effect this week, the latest salvo between the two countries in an ongoing trade war. The ban is set to come into effect on Tuesday and will impact Canadian-made cheese and other dairy products, as well as alcoholic beverages and Canadian-made motorcycles.

Hours before U.S. President Donald Trump’s ban on imports of Canadian alcohol, some dairy products and motorcycles is set to go into effect, he accused Canada of being “entitled” when asked if a deal to avert the ban was possible.

“They take advantage of us. They feel entitled, and, you know, they get 95 per cent of the business they do with the United States,” said Trump, speaking to reporters from the Oval Office Monday.

“There’s so many things and they feel entitled, and, you know, they’re not a state. There’s nothing they have that we need.”

Business leaders say the new import ban will lead to a “tornado of changes,” while stakeholders caution how the move will likely hit some harder than others.

“We had a great competitive advantage for manufacturing, and we’re losing that,” says Craig Peters, founder and CEO of Maverick Distillery.

“Just today alone, we’ve got two tractor trailers that are shipping across the border just to try and get them across before that midnight deadline, where all Canadian products will then be banned from entering the U.S.”

Trump signed new executive orders on Sept. 8 to impose a ban on these imports as of Sept. 29 at 12:01 a.m. Eastern time, which he said was in response to retaliatory counter-tariffs by the Canadian government on some U.S. goods. Those measures were triggered after Trump introduced a wave of 50 per cent tariffs on hundreds of Canadian goods in August valued at about C$28 billion.

The Canadian Chamber of Commerce’s president and CEO, Candace Laing, said in a statement on Sept. 9 that these bans are “a tornado of changes at once, intended to overwhelm.”

“For standing up, this is actually exactly what you’d expect. The U.S. Administration is punishing Canada — by punishing themselves — for the whole world to see. They’re seeking to make an example of Canada, even though everyone knows we’re their closest trading partner,” said Laing.

“It will be on the U.S. government to justify to its businesses, workers and communities the price for them of going it alone and paying more to do it.”

The import ban will mean another hit to businesses as it effectively shuts off the U.S. customer base for many, although some economic experts believe the broader economic impact of the bans will be minimal.

“The newly-banned products account for a very small share of our trade with the United States,” said economics professor Joseph Steinberg at the University of Toronto in a statement.

“Going from a tariff of 50 per cent to an outright embargo is far less impactful than going from free trade to embargo.”

Steinberg also said the impact is more symbolic than a material hit to the economy, and it is mostly in retaliation to Canada’s provincial bans on U.S. alcohol initiated since last year.

To date, all provinces and territories, with the exception of Alberta and Saskatchewan, maintain their bans on the sale of U.S. alcohol products.

Although the majority of alcohol produced within Canada is bought and consumed by Canadians within the country, many individual producers will likely take a hit from the new import bans.

“We had typically sent about 20 to 25 per cent of our product to the U.S. That’s obviously drawing up to be zero, but at the same time, there’s a huge outpouring of Canadian support to support those local brands,” says Peters.

“Even with the uptake in Canadian business, you’re down relative to where you would have been if you could keep just selling to the States. Yeah, shipping to the U.S. was a very important revenue channel.”

Peters adds that it will probably take a few years for his businesses to otherwise make up for that overnight loss in revenue.

“It’ll probably be a year or two or three before we rebound from the channel of business we’re losing,” Peters said.

Spirits Canada, which represents Canadian producers of vodka, whiskey, rum, tequila, gin and other alcohol products, told Global News on Monday that its industry’s position remains unchanged since its statement issued when the ban was first announced on Sept. 8.

“Spirits Canada is very concerned by the United States’ decision to prohibit the importation of certain Canadian alcoholic beverages,” said Spirts Canada in a statement from Sept. 9.

“The consequences for Canada’s spirits sector could be significant.”

Spirits Canada said about half of the nearly $2 billion in product its industry produces annually is shipped to the U.S., and last year, 93 per cent of all exported spirits was headed to the U.S.

“This leaves Canadian producers with limited ability to replace lost U.S. demand in the near term,” the statement said.

Spirts Canada also said that it continues to urge governments to “find a path forward that prevents further escalation, restores stable and predictable market access, and protects the businesses and workers who depend on the Canada-U.S. spirits trade.”

Beer Canada says although the ban will have a minimal impact on the industry as a whole, individual businesses with more U.S. trade exposure will get hit hard.

“More than 90 percent of the beer Canadians buy is brewed in Canada, so this is an industry built for the domestic market,” said Richard Alexander, president of Beer Canada in a statement.

“But for the Canadian brewers who have spent years building customers in the United States, tonight’s ban turns a 50 percent tariff into a closed border, with no exemption under CUSMA. For those businesses, this is serious.”

Alexander also said Canadian beer producers are already being impacted financially by separate tariffs on aluminum and packaging that have driven up costs for more than a year, and many breweries have had to absorb those costs.

Canada’s wine growers are also bracing for what an industry representative expects to be “lasting consequences.”

“The U.S. market is one that Canadian wineries have spent many years building. Even a temporary loss of access can have lasting consequences because relationships with consumers, importers, distributors, and retailers take years to establish and can be difficult to rebuild,” said Dan Paszkowski, president and CEO of Wine Growers Canada in a statement.

“In a period of significant trade uncertainty, wineries and growers need certainty to make investment decisions, plan production and build for future growth.”

As many Canadian cheese and other dairy products are also targeted by these bans, Dairy Farmers of Canada said it’s “disappointed.”

“Canadian dairy farmers are primarily focused on producing milk for Canadians, and we’re disappointed to see certain dairy exports targeted,” said Dairy Farmers of Canada in a statement.

“The reality is that tariffs and bans will have impacts in both countries, disrupting supply chains and may make things harder for food manufacturers.”

Statistics Canada reported just over $700 million in dairy exports to the U.S. in 2024, though it’s unclear how much of that would have been affected by a full ban like the one Trump has threatened.

Trade negotiations between Canada and the U.S. have been mostly on pause since Prime Minister Mark Carney said in August that Canada walked away from a bad deal.

Carney cited three main issues with the proposed deal, including last-minute tariff changes that tipped the scales in favour of the U.S., that the U.S. wanted to influence Canada’s ability to create trade partnerships with other nations, and there were undisclosed requirements he said undermined French Canadian language and cultural values.

Trump’s trade czar, Jamieson Greer, said last week that the president was “comfortable” with the current pause in trade talks, and there was “no urgency” to return to the bargaining table.

Carney has also said there are no plans to escalate the trade war further, but it is unclear if these bans can be avoided, or how long they may last for.

This, Steinberg says, is why “I think we’re in a holding pattern.”

When asked to comment on the looming trade ban, Canada-U.S. Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc’s office said they “take note of the coming into force of the Administration’s previously announced trade measures.”

“As has been the case for the last 18 months, our first priority remains on protecting and supporting Canadian workers, farmers, families, and businesses from these unjustified actions,” said a spokesperson for LeBlanc in a statement.

“Our core focus is on what we can control: building strength at home, diversifying our partnerships abroad, and building Canada strong for all Canadians.”

– with a file from Global News’ Reggie Cecchini

© 2026 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

GoFundMe for 81-year-old delivery driver pulled over 'misrepresentations'

The GoFundMe page for an 81-year-old delivery driver, who was spotted delivering lost luggage on a doorbell camera, has been removed from the website following “factual misrepresentations.”

The digital fundraising website told Global News that it “identified factual misrepresentations” and ended the campaign, which raised over US$700,000 for delivery driver Don Johnson.

According to the original GoFundMe page, a woman named Erin Howell started the campaign to help Johnson, who she said “has been working around the clock delivering luggage to make ends meet.”

But GoFundMe told Global News that it found “misrepresentations” in the campaign.

“Our Trust & Safety team identified factual misrepresentations, which directly violates our Terms of Service,” the platform said in a statement on Monday. “As a result, the fundraiser has been removed and all donors have been refunded.”

“Ensuring GoFundMe is a safe and trusted place to give and receive help is our top priority. Taking action like this allows GoFundMe to protect donors’ generosity and our continued ability to support people who are fundraising to help others,” GoFundMe added.

“GoFundMe’s policies, along with those of our payment processors, require authenticity and transparency for donors, and are strictly enforced,” the platform said. “Because that standard wasn’t met here, donors were protected under our GoFundMe Giving Guarantee, which guarantees a full refund in the rare case something isn’t right.”

GoFundMe also revealed that it had received a tip from a concerned community member about the organizer of the fundraiser, which led to an investigation.

During the investigation, the GoFundMe team called the organizer of the campaign on a recorded line and told her that the call was being recorded.

When the organizer of the campaign was asked if Don and Josephine Johnson were her parents, the organizer confirmed they are, according to GoFundMe.

The original GoFundMe description for Johnson, an independent contractor who delivers lost or delayed luggage to homes from the airport, claimed a woman had witnessed the man delivering luggage that had been lost on a recent flight.

“He looked absolutely exhausted, and his steps were heavy with effort. It completely broke my heart to see a man of his age doing such intense, grueling physical labor, so I opened my door to meet him and to offer my help. That is when I learned the devastating truth about his situation,” the organizer wrote.

The organizer also said that Johnson isn’t working by choice but “working for survival.”

“His beautiful wife of 57 years, Josephine, is currently fighting a severe battle against cancer. The staggering medical bills, continuous treatments, expensive prescription medications, and everyday costs of living have completely overwhelmed them,” the fundraiser description added.

“At an age when he should be resting and spending every precious single moment by his wife’s side, he is out on the road lifting heavy bags just to keep her alive and cared for.”

After GoFundMe pulled the fundraiser from the website, Johnson’s daughter Amy revealed that she had set up the fundraising campaign under a different name.

Once the GoFundMe page was removed, Amy launched a new fundraiser for her parents on GiveSendGo, where she explained what had happened to the first campaign.

“Hi, I’m Amy. Don is my dad. Josephine is my mom. My mom has pancreatic cancer. The bills are high. My dad is 81 and still works delivering luggage so they can stay afloat. The neighbor story is real. The doorcam video is real. The diagnosis is real. The job is real,” Amy wrote in the description.

“A lot of you already gave on GoFundMe. We are so grateful. That page was originally set up on my account because it was already established and we thought that would be the simplest way,” she continued.

“When the name on the page was updated, GoFundMe treated it as a discrepancy. We offered documentation. They refunded the donations anyway. We know that is frustrating. It is frustrating for us too. Nobody wanted your gift sent back.”

“Nothing about my mom’s treatment changed. Nothing about my dad’s age or his work changed. They still need help,” she added.

The GiveSendGo fundraiser had raised more than $55,000 of its $100,000 goal from more than 1,000 donations as of Monday afternoon.

© 2026 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

You May Also Like

Top Stories