The Ongoing History of New Music, episode 1087: A follow-up to alt-rock one-hit wonders

Okay, okay, okay! I hear you! Lemme make some amends here.

In spring 2026, I set out to explore alt-rock one-hit wonders. It was a five-episode series in six parts (very Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, that) on the biggest songs of that sort since 1976, which is year zero for the whole alternative thing… more or less. Let’s not get bogged down here.

The first five episodes covered ten songs each, all ranked using a complicated logarithmic formula designed by my friend, Walter the mathematician. A lot of effort went into that top 50 list—but it wasn’t enough.

That’s where the sixth episode came in. It was an addendum, an erratum, really, of songs that maybe should have made it into the original top 50 list. Fine. I’m big enough to admit when I’ve made an error or left something out.

I did the sixth episode, and I thought, “Well, that’s over. We’re done here.” But apparently not. In the weeks and months that followed, I got hundreds of emails and DMs from people pointing out even more alt-rock one-hit wonders that should have made the cut.

This left me uneasy. The job wasn’t done, and I hate loose ends. So let’s do the one-hit-wonder thing one more time, incorporating some of those missed tracks. And I’ll explain why several acts who are thought to be one-hit wonders really aren’t.

So, clean-up on aisle three, I guess. Here we go…

Songs heard on this show:

  • Voice of America, The Story of Love
  • When in Rome, The Promise
  • 4 Non-Blondes, What’s Up?
  • Tripping Daisy, I Got a Girl
  • Jars of Clay, Flood
  • Primitive Radio Gods, Standing Outside a Broken Phone Booth with Money in My Hand
  • Dog’s Eye View, Everything Falls Apart
  • Len, Steal My Sunshine

Here’s Eric Wilhite’s playlist.

The Ongoing History of New Music can be heard on these stations:

© 2026 Corus Radio, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

BC Conservatives makes 1st policy announcement of election campaign

WATCH LIVE: BC Conservatives make 1st policy announcement of election campaign

B.C. Conservative Interim Leader Lorne Doerkson is set to make a campaign announcement as the provincial snap election nears the end of its first week.

Doerkson is expected to unveil the party’s first policy announcement as it kicks off the campaign.

It’s also Doerkson’s first official campaign appearance since the election began.

Days after the election was called on Tuesday, Doerkson’s party leads the way with a new poll suggesting 43 per cent of leaning and decided voters intend to vote for the Conservatives. The number is up six points in just 11 days.

The BC NDP are now down six points at 35 per cent, dropping from a slim four-point advantage they held 12 days earlier.

© 2026 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

Nor'easter floods parts of U.S. northeast, leaves over 130K without power

A powerful nor’easter battered the Northeast again on Sunday, flooding coastal communities and leaving tens of thousands of homes and businesses without power as forecasters warned that another round of high tides could inundate vulnerable shorelines.

The slow-moving storm, which killed a New York City housing authority worker when a tree fell Saturday, was expected to linger through Sunday with heavy rain, strong winds and dangerous surf from New Jersey to New England.

The storm remained just south of Long Island and east of northern New Jersey on Sunday morning and was expected to loop around the area for roughly another 24 hours, said Bob Oravec, a lead forecaster with the National Weather Service in College Park, Maryland.

The worst of the remaining rainfall was expected Sunday from northern New Jersey through New York City and Long Island into southern New England. The storm was gradually weakening, Oravec said, but the threat of tidal flooding would linger through high-tide cycles Sunday morning and again in the evening.

“The most impactful parts of the storm are likely going to be the high winds and the tidal flooding,” Oravec said.

The nor’easter triggered memories of Superstorm Sandy, which left behind over $60 billion in damage across the eastern U.S. in 2012. While this storm’s impact has been nowhere near that, it could be the first of several along the East Coast this fall because of an El Niño climate pattern that’s disrupting this year’s weather.

More than 130,000 customers were without power across the Northeast and mid-Atlantic Sunday morning, according to PowerOutage.us.

The most widespread outages were along the New Jersey shore, New York’s Long Island and coastal counties in Connecticut. Toppled trees across Long Island damaged homes and cars, blocked streets and downed numerous utility lines.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency said response coordination centers in impacted regions were operating at an “enhanced posture,” and teams were on standby in New England in case of widespread outages.

On Saturday in New Jersey and New York, some people kayaked down flooded streets. Others headed to beaches to try to surf the higher-than-usual waves. Emergency crews in Sea Bright, New Jersey, rescued a woman and her dog after their vehicle became trapped in floodwaters, ABC7 reported.

In Surf City, New Jersey, water rose inside a marina where workers had moved equipment to higher ground, and owner Kenny Formica said customers reported boats and Jet Skis missing or blown from their lifts. In Norfolk, Virginia, floodwaters left passing cars pushing wakes through some streets.

The storm also disrupted travel throughout the region. Hundreds of flights were canceled at Boston Logan International Airport, while flooding cut off highway access to North Carolina’s Hatteras Island, stranding visitors and forcing one couple to scramble to relocate their wedding after most of their roughly 45 guests were unable to reach the island.

—AP journalist Julie Walker contributed from New York.

© 2026 The Canadian Press

New U.S. bans to take effect Tuesday: Here's what's affected

RELATED: Trump drops tariff on Irish whiskey while booze ban looms for Canada

U.S. import bans on select Canadian items are set to take effect this week, the latest salvo between the two countries in an ongoing trade war.

The ban is set to come into effect on Tuesday at 12:01 a.m., and will see a full import ban on Canadian-made cheese and other dairy products, as well as alcoholic beverages and Canadian-made motorcycles.

When he signed the executive orders implementing the bans on Sept. 8, Trump said the decision was in response to Canada’s own counter-tariff measures. Those Canadian tariffs went into effect earlier in the day on Sept. 8 and were in retaliation for the president’s 50 per cent tariffs on numerous Canadian goods.

Trump also said Canada hasn’t stopped discriminating against U.S. autos, dairy and vehicles so they can now block the import of certain products because it was “consistent with the interests of the United States and the public interests.”

What is affected?

Alcohol

Though a majority of alcohol in Canada is sold within the country, much of what is exported internationally is sent to the U.S.

According to a fact sheet released by the White House, dozens of products will be banned Tuesday including rye, whisky, wine, beer, vermouth, tequila, vodka and rum. Some of the products banned also include both packaged and unpackaged versions.

The Government of Canada’s Trade Commissioner Service reports Canada exported $1.36 billion in alcoholic beverages in 2023 and 90 per cent went to the U.S. Of that number, two-thirds were for spirits alone.

Wine Growers of Canada previously told Global News about $8.3 million of wine was exported to the U.S. in 2025, 57 per cent of which was represented by ice wine alone.

Beer Canada reported $28 million in beer products was exported out of the country last year, amounting to about 10 per cent of all beer produced. The organization said the U.S. is its number one partner for exports.

Dairy

Dairy trade has been a sticking point in negotiations between Canada and the U.S., with it being among the issues brought up by American negotiators in recent negotiations.

Whey is the main focus of Tuesday’s ban on dairy, with both whey protein and other whey products being on the list. Whey is a byproduct of the cheesemaking process.

The list released by the White House also indicated both cane and invert molasses would be excluded from being imported to the U.S.

The Dairy Farmers of Canada told Global News earlier this month that the escalation of trade actions was “deeply concerning,” though did not confirm the annual value of dairy exports to the U.S. or how much would be impacted by the potential ban.

Statistics Canada reported just over $700 million in dairy exports to the U.S. in 2024, though it’s unclear how much of that would have been affected by a full ban like the one Trump has threatened.

Motorcycles

The number of items was limited, but Trump’s upcoming import bans did include one from the automotive sector: motorcycles. 

Motorcycles, including mopeds, and cycles fitted with a “reciprocating internal combustion engine” that has a cylinder capacity over 800 ccs were listed on the White House’s document outlining what motor vehicles would be banned.

No signs the tit-for-tat trade war ending soon

It’s unlikely the ongoing trade war will end before the ban takes effect, with Trade Representative Jamieson Greer saying that Trump was “comfortable” with where things stood with trade talks.

Greer told CNBC that the U.S. still has “a lot of other trade” with Canada, and they’re “getting what we need” in terms of items like oil, gas and potash.

He added that Canada “periodically” comes and says they want to have a deal.

Canada-U.S. Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc told Global News that Canada “maintains ongoing communications with our American counterparts.” He did not, however, say if they’ve requested a deal.

–with files from Global News’ Ariel Rabinovitch and Uday Rana

© 2026 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

Recipe: Recheado Masala

Recheado Masala

Ingredients

Coconut vinegar | white vinegar – 200 ml
Water – 500 ml
Kashmiri red chilli – 50 pc
Black peppercorn – 2 tbsp
Clove – 1 tbsp
Cumin – 3 tbsp
Cinnamon – 2 inch stick
Tamarind pulp – 5 tbsp
Jaggery | Sugar – ½ cup
Turmeric – 1 tsp
Salt to taste

Instructions:

Chilli Masala
1. Add all the masala ingredients to a bowl and let them sit for 30 minutes. This allows the spices to soften and absorb the liquid.
2. Transfer the mixture to a blender and blend until you have a smooth, fine paste, you can add more water if needed.

Prawns
1. For 4 jumbo prawns, heat a pan over medium-high heat. Season the prawns with salt and sear them on both sides until nicely coloured.
2. Add 2–3 tbsp of the chilli masala paste, 2 tsp sugar, and a small splash of water.
3. Sauté for approximately 1 minute, allowing the masala to coat the prawns and cook through.
4. Add 2 tbsp butter and finish with chopped cilantro.
5. Toss well and serve immediately

© 2026 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

Threats to Canada’s North have ‘shifted significantly,’ foreign minister says

Threats to the Canadian Arctic have “shifted significantly” in recent years amidst Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine and an upended geopolitical order, Canada’s foreign minister says.

But despite political tensions, Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand told The West Block’s Jeff Semple that Canada and the United States remain in close coordination on Arctic security and sovereignty issues.

Anand said she attended a meeting of Arctic nations convened by U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio last week and they “had a frank discussion about the collective need to work together on Arctic security.”

“So the United States is very much at the table in this conversation. And one of the ongoing dialogues that Secretary Rubio and I have had specifically … is in fact how can Canada and the United States ensure that our shared interests in the Arctic are advocated, are worked on within the confines of multilateral organizations including NATO.”

Anand, who formerly served as minister of national defence under former prime minister Justin Trudeau, pointed to Prime Minister Mark Carney’s decision to ramp up defence spending and the impact that money will have on northern security. That includes a massive contract to German company TKMS to build a new fleet of as many as 12 submarines, as well as the federal governments still as-yet finalized decision to buy new fighter jets.

On the diplomatic front, Anand pointed to the newly-opened Canadian consulate in Nuuk, Greenland, and plans to open one in Anchorage, Alaska.

Anand said that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 has changed thinking not only of the security environment in Europe, but in the Arctic as well.

“So while Canada has Operation Reassurance on the Eastern flank, we cannot forget that NATO, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, should have a view that is based on a strategic assessment of the North and the Arctic, in order to ensure that we are well defended and protected in terms of the Arctic, not only on the Eastern flank” Anand said.

The threat to Canada’s Arctic maybe be shifting, but so are northerners’ perceptions of Canada’s once-closest ally.

Global News reported last week that new polling suggested residents of Canada’s North — including Nunavut, the Northwest Territories, Yukon and Nunavik — view the United States as the greatest threat facing the region.

Nearly half of respondents (48 per cent) to a poll for the Observatoire de la politique et la sécurité de l’Arctique (OPSA) saw the U.S. has the greatest threat, followed distantly by Russia (30 per cent) and China (12 per cent).

© 2026 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

Pope Francis says medically-assisted dying is 'false compassion'

RELATED: Canada's MAID and mental health debate: a bioethicist weighs in

Pope Leo XIV on Sunday blasted the legalization of medically assisted death as immoral “false compassion,” as he doubled down on Catholic teaching about life during a visit Sunday to Lourdes, the French Catholic shrine associated with miraculous cures of the sick.

On his third day in France, Leo again waded into the end-of-life debate that has erupted in countries around the world. It roiled French politics for years before resulting recently in legislation allowing adults with incurable illnesses to receive lethal medication.

Leo’s visit to the once staunchly Catholic and officially secular France has been marked by huge crowds — 800,000 at Leo’s Mass on Paris’ iconic Place de la Concorde — and his messaging against abortion and assisted dying.

On Sunday, the American pope celebrated Mass before some 150,000 people — many in wheelchairs — on the prairie next to Lourdes’ main basilica. He then visited a care center for sick people on the sanctuary’s grounds. He sought to encourage especially those who live in “terrible pain” that they have inherent dignity that no law or algorithm can “eliminate.”

“On the contrary, it is precisely in the name of this inalienable dignity of the human person that we must reject the temptation to cause death under the guise of false compassion,” he said. “What is legal is not necessarily moral,” Leo said to applause from the crowd.

Lourdes became a major pilgrimage destination after the Catholic Church officially recognized visions of the Virgin Mary reported here by a young girl in 1858. The site near the Spanish border draws millions of pilgrims each year, especially sick and disabled believers hoping for a cure from the famed spring water in the Lourdes grotto where the visions purportedly occurred.

Leo arrived in Lourdes from Paris on Saturday night and immediately prayed inside the Grotto of Apparitions and drank from the spring.

“He has given a message of hope for France, a message of hope and greatness for France, and renewal for France,” said Paris pilgrim Pierre Caziljc.

Pope delivers a message about life while in France

In France, Leo has repeatedly called for a renewed respect for life in keeping with Catholic teaching that all human life must be protected and defended from conception until natural death. The teaching translates into firm opposition to abortion, euthanasia and medically assisted dying.

In Lourdes, where the church has recognized 72 “miraculous” cures as authentic, the question of respecting even the most frail, sick and vulnerable is particularly acute.

“Your crutches, your wheelchairs and your hidden tears are not obstacles; instead, they are the very place where you are fully respected and welcomed,” Leo said in his homily. “Lourdes is blessed as a place for professing the beauty and sanctity of life, for life is welcomed here as a precious gift from God.”

Survivors visit Lourdes as part of their healing process

More recently, Lourdes has also become a place of healing for survivors of clergy sexual abuse. Leo was to meet with seven survivors later Sunday, including one who was abused as an adult, in recognition of the new frontier of the abuse crisis facing the church.

The French church has endured a brutal reckoning with its legacy of abuse. An independent report in 2021 estimated 330,000 children had been abused over 70 years by some 3,000 priests and church workers.

Despite criticism of the report’s methodology and conclusions, French bishops put in place an independent system of compensation for victims that to date has recommended the church pay out more than 20 million euros ($22.7 million).

During a meeting with French bishops on Sunday morning, Leo praised their response to victims and urged them to continue. But he also acknowledged that the cratering in priestly vocations in the French church is related to the scandal, given the priesthood is now sometimes viewed with suspicion.

“For priestly vocations to flourish, the priest must be welcomed, accepted, and loved,” Leo said.

On the day Leo arrived in Paris, a group of victims wrote an open letter asking him to acknowledge the church’s responsibility in the scandal, highlighting what critics see as the conflict of interest of bishops being asked to be both spiritual fathers to their priests and judges when they abuse.

“The Church must relinquish its position as both judge and party to the proceedings,” the victims wrote in the letter published by French newspaper Liberation. The victims also complained that only seven of them would meet with Leo, chosen by the church.

Monsignor Pierre-Antoine Bozo, spokesperson for the bishops’ conference, said Leo intentionally wanted to keep the group small to facilitate an intimate encounter.

“When it comes to listening to them, you can’t have 50 people in front of you,” he said. “So I think that’s really what the pope chose: to listen so that we can act and respond more effectively.”

Mosaics are a painful reminder of alleged abuse

In Lourdes, Leo was also reminded of a prickly abuse case inherited from Pope Francis.

The façade of one of the Lourdes basilicas was designed by the Rev. Marko Rupnik, one of the Catholic Church’s most famous mosaic artists.

Rupnik is currently on trial in a Vatican court, accused by more than two dozen women of having psychologically, spiritually and sexually abused them starting in the 1990s, including during the creation of his artworks.

His case was covered up for three decades by his Jesuit superiors, and even Francis was suspected of having protected his fellow Jesuit. In response to a media outcry, Francis ordered a canonical trial in 2024, which is ongoing.

The Rupnik case posed the question of what to do with his mosaics, which adorn basilicas around the world.

Lourdes Bishop Jean-Marc Micas in 2025 decided cover the façade of the Notre Dame du Rosaire Basilica, reasoning that abuse victims who come to Lourdes for healing shouldn’t be forced to see them.

On Sunday, Leo looped in front of the basilica in his popemobile, passing by the mosaic panels now covered by mustard-colored curtains affixed with plastic ties.

In a letter to Leo ahead of his trip, five women who say they were abused by Rupnik praised Micas’ decision to cover the mosaics but criticized the Vatican’s treatment of their case and the three decades it has taken for them to be heard.

“This prolonged and loud silence has been experienced by us, the victims, as a further, continuous violence,” they wrote.

—Associated Press writer Samuel Petrequin in Paris contributed to this report.

© 2026 The Canadian Press

A new book sheds light on the birth of punk in New York City fifty years ago

Fifty years ago, a series of events on both sides of the Atlantic conspired to give birth to a new strain of rock that was paradoxically both revolutionary and reactionary. It was branded as “punk rock.” Over about 12 months, it demonstrated an aesthetic, an attitude and a sense of fashion, although punk split into two distinct flavours. In the U.K., punk was political, an assault on the class system and sometimes violent. But in New York, it was more art than angst. More than a few poets, writers and painters were part of that original scene.

NYC punk’s epicentre back then was CBGB, a former biker bar on the ground floor of a flophouse hotel filled with the broken, addicted and indigent. From a small scene that began coalescing in late 1973 and early 1974, many a legend was born. Together with Britain’s spin on things, the punk of 1976 was the Big Bang for the creation of what we now call “alternative rock.”

Legs McNeil was a sub-100 lb teenager who was there. He’s chronicled things for years, starting with a ‘zine called Punk (more on that in a moment) along with a series of books, most notably Please Kill Me a 1996 oral history of the era co-created with Gillian McCain. It’s a must-read for anyone interested in music history.

Legs’ new book is Resident Punk: How I Smoked, Drank, and Stumbled My Way Through the ’70s Punk Scene and Beyond. I had a chance to speak with him about it.

Alan Cross:  How would you describe this book?

Legs McNeil: I hated being labeled a music journalist. I still hate it. I never wanted to be a rock critic. I wanted the people who actually did it, who were in the room, to tell the story. And I did that. It’s snapshots. I thought I’d put down different snapshots of my life, like Polaroids. I thought of it as taking Polaroids. Remember, people used to take Polaroids in the ’70s and that was all the rage. Andy Warhol used to take them all the time. And I thought, Oh, I’ll just write little Polaroids.

Alan Cross: Can we agree, more or less, that 1976 is the beginning of what the public would call punk rock?

Legs McNeil: Yes. We had been working on Punk magazine through 1975. John Holmstrom got the idea to do this magazine about rock and roll and comic books. He wanted to call it Teenage News. I said, “That’s stupid. Count me out.” Teenage News sounded like Scholastic magazine, for crying out loud. I didn’t want any part of that.

Alan Cross: Who came up with the word “punk”?

Legs McNeil: I did.

Alan Cross: Why?

Legs McNeil: Because that’s what I’d been called my whole life. It just seemed obvious. What I wanted to do, and I think what Holmstrom wanted to do, was create a new Mad magazine, because John’s teachers at the School of Visual Arts were Will Eisner and Harvey Kurtzman. One of those guys had gotten John a job at Scholastic, where John had a comic strip called Joe. We were paid $300, and I was still in high school. If I wrote a four-panel Joe comic, I got paid $150. So John and I had already been working together off and on.

Alan Cross: Here’s the story I’ve heard: The first issue of Punk comes out with Lou Reed on the cover. It’s called Punk, and then you go around interviewing other musicians, artists and creators who were part of that scene in ’75 and early ’76. And it came to pass that any musician who was featured in Punk magazine was a punk rocker.

Legs McNeil: None of the people, including the Ramones, wanted to be called a punk rock band. In fact, Johnny Ramone asked Holmstrom to cross out the word “punk” in every magazine. No one wanted to be called punk when we put out the magazine. No one.

Alan Cross: So why did the term stick?

Legs McNeil: I have no idea. Because the media needed something to attach it to. We thought it was funny to put out a magazine called Punk. Doesn’t that strike you as kind of hysterically funny?

Alan Cross: I remember when punks were guys in leather jackets on motorcycles, committing acts of vandalism and beating up old people for their money. Those were punks. Ne’er-do-wells.

Legs McNeil: Yeah. I weighed 99 pounds dripping wet and I wore a black leather jacket, and everyone thought I was a tough guy. I was not a tough guy at all. John always wore a blue denim jacket and the same T-shirt, which said “We’re Almost Finished.” John was not a punk. John was an intellectual, a contrarian intellectual and a fantastic artist. And he taught me how to write, just by arguing with him. We argued about everything.

Alan Cross: So the word catches on for reasons we don’t understand. Probably because the New York Times or the New York Post or somebody picked up on it.

Legs McNeil: We put up these posters that said “Watch Out! Punk Is Coming!” all over New York City. It was like November 1975, and it was freezing cold. You had to slap the wheat paste on and get the poster up before it froze. It was awful. Debbie Harry said, “We thought it was another sh*tty band with an even sh*ttier name.” And then it came out, and it was this magazine, and it was hysterically funny.

Alan Cross: So the mainstream, regular people didn’t get the joke.

Legs McNeil: No. No one got the joke.

Alan Cross: Why did Johnny Ramone want the word removed from articles about the band?

Legs McNeil: Because they just thought they were a rock and roll band.

Alan Cross: Well, they weren’t.

Legs McNeil: I know, I know. To me, they were the first, besides Iggy. Iggy and the Stooges, Raw Power and Fun House, that was punk. And the MC5, and Patti Smith.

Alan Cross: So here we are in 2026, and this is sort of the 50th anniversary of punk. But punk didn’t just explode in 1976.

Legs McNeil: Punk never exploded. It never sold. But it became very, very important.

Alan Cross: Punk became very important to the right people. We have the MC5, we have Iggy Pop in ’71 and ’72, we have the New York Dolls in ’73, we have Television, CBGB opens, and in ’74 the Ramones play their first show.

Legs McNeil: And before that, we had the ultimate punk band, which was the Velvet Underground. They did everything first. You’ve got to give it to Lou and John Cale and Sterling Morrison and Nico. I mean, Nico invented Goth. How many different forms of music did the Velvet Underground invent? And those two albums are just fantastic.

Alan Cross: Pretty much incalculable. So take me back to 1976. You’re in New York. How old are you?

Legs McNeil: Nineteen. No, I was 19 in ’75. I lied about my age because I wanted to stay a teenager. I was born in ’56, so I was 20 in ’76, but I said I was 19. I had been 19 in ’75, when we started the magazine.

Alan Cross: Where exactly were you living?

Legs McNeil: In the Punk Dump. It was on 30th Street, at the entrance to the Lincoln Tunnel. There were all these transvestites who came out at night. There was always a big traffic jam trying to get into the Lincoln Tunnel, and the transvestites solicited johns in their cars while they were waiting. New York was fantastic. It was the end of white flight. Every other building on the Lower East Side had been burned out by the landlord, because the rent wasn’t paying the mortgage anymore. They’d burn out their buildings, and they were immediately taken over by drug dealers who lowered down baskets. You’d put your cash in the basket, they’d hoist it back up, and then they’d lower down whatever drug you wanted, heroin or cocaine.

Alan Cross: Not to mention that the city itself was broke, and the garbage was piling up everywhere.

Legs McNeil: Yes, it was amazing. It was like a giant movie set. It was like Dresden after the firestorm, I always say. It was destroyed. No one wanted to live there except us. We thought it was fantastic. I was hanging out with Joey . We were drinking and going out and trying to pick up chicks.

Alan Cross: So were you one of those guys who was always in the room when things were happening?

Legs McNeil: Yeah, I was.

Alan Cross: How were you able to make ends meet? How did you pay the bills?

Legs McNeil: Girlfriends. We didn’t have a shower in the Punk Dump, so you’d say, “Hey, can I take a shower at your house?” And they’d let you, and you’d move in. And if you had a stripper girlfriend, they made 700 bucks a week in $1 bills, so you’d see her counting out the $1 bills. $700 was a lot of money then.

I was on a mission from God. You’ve got to remember, in the ’70s there were only two ways to be. You were either a hippie, a Grateful Dead, dope-smoking hippie, or a jock. Those were the only two things to be. And it seemed like the world was a bigger place, and there had to be more weirdos like us who didn’t fit into either. I hated sports. I was born with one leg longer than the other. Eventually they did a femoral shortening, where they cut two inches off my right femur. Before my operation, I always slouched to keep my legs even, which is why everyone called me a punk. I looked like a total asshole, which I was.

Alan Cross: Is that where the name “Legs” came from?

Legs McNeil: Yes, it is.

Legs has some incredible stories to tell about The Ramones, Lou Reed, Patti Smith, Andy Warhol, KISS, critic Lester Bangs, and even Diana Ross. It’s insightful, funny and a great window on some of the things that needed to happen for alternative music to exist today.

Resident Punk: How I Smoked, Drank, and Stumbled My Way Through the ’70s Punk Scene and Beyond is published by BenBella Books. This interview was lightly edited for length and clarity.

© 2026 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

U.K. police arrest 5 men near air base, suspected of preparing terror act

UK police said Sunday that five men arrested in the middle of the night near an air base used by the United States during its war against Iran are being held on suspicion of preparing a terrorist act.

London’s Metropolitan Police, which takes the lead on potential terrorism activities, said in a statement that police received a call at 12:45 a.m. related to three suspicious vehicles which appeared to be traveling toward the air base. The base is U.K. owned and U.S. operated under an agreement dating back to the Cold War.

The five men were initially arrested in the Whelford area, which backs onto RAF Fairford, the base that hosts the headquarters of the U.S. Air Force’s 501st Combat Support Wing and the 420th Air Base Squadron.

Fairford has been used by American forces for strictly limited strikes during the war with Iran. After the start of the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran on Feb. 28, the U.K. government allowed the American military to use the Fairford base to strike Iranian missile sites. Iran has said bombers flying from the base have been used for strikes beyond the original remit.

“We are in the early stages of an investigation, and five men remain in custody,” said Vicki Evans, the Met’s deputy assistant commissioner. “As you would expect, we are working closely with our partners to understand the circumstances of the incident.”

She said a 400-meter cordon has been put in place around the three vehicles that raised suspicion while the army conducts examinations. As a precaution, around 85 households have been evacuated whilst these examinations take place.

Aerial footage from Sky News appeared to show a bomb disposal robot roaming between three white trucks. The rear doors of two of the vans were open and large black items could be seen scattered around. The robot appeared to be working toward getting access to the third truck.

The local Gloucestershire police force said the situation appeared to be “contained.”

A spokesperson for the U.S. Air Force said U.S. and British personnel “remain vigilant” and will take appropriate actions to ensure safety of all those at the base.

“For operational security reasons we will not discuss specific force protection measures,” the spokesperson said. “We constantly assess a variety of factors that determine what measures we institute or modify to protect our installations, our people and their families.”

The arrests come at a time of heightened tensions around the threat from hostile states to the U.K., with Russia and Iran among those that have used proxies to commit crimes on their behalf on British soil. In March, officials said the number of national security cases involving activity by hostile states including Iran increased 50% in the six months to December 2025.

Residents in a number of properties in Whelford have been taken to a nearby recreation center.

Julian Tudsbery, who has lived in Whelford for 30 years, said a resident had reported three “suspicious vans” in the village in the early hours of Sunday morning.

“There were several police, three police cars in the drive, and they said you need to evacuate, there’s been a major incident, said he couldn’t elaborate,” he said.

Britain’s Defense Secretary Wes Streeting thanked the emergency and specialist teams who responded to the incident.

“We can be reassured that this is being dealt with,” he said.

Prime Minister Andy Burnham is receiving updates on the situation, his office said.

© 2026 The Canadian Press

Canada's premiers tight-lipped on constitutional changes in Alberta referendum

RELATED: Apathy concerns over the 'other nine' Alberta referendum questions

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith’s counterparts across the country are keeping their cards close to their chest on where they stand on the major constitutional reforms Smith is sending to a provincewide vote next month.

Smith’s four proposals, three of which would likely require the support of seven legislatures representing over half of Canada’s population (known as the 7/50 rule) and Parliament to implement, are among 10 questions she’s putting to Albertans on Oct. 19.

Her ideas, in brief, are: to abolish the Senate; let Alberta, not Ottawa, pick provincial King’s Bench and Court of Appeal judges; allow Alberta to opt out of federal programs without losing the associated funding; and to give provincial laws standing over Ottawa’s when jurisdictional disputes occur.

Smith’s government concedes on its referendum website that abolishing the Senate, which would require unanimous cross-country support and the support of the Senate itself, is going to be a non-starter for other political leaders.

But the premier’s office says there’s support for the other proposals and that “targeted” amendments to Canada’s legal and administrative spine are more likely to become reality, which is why it wants a mandate from Albertans to proceed.

“Provinces across the country are tired of federal overreach and want more authority within Confederation, not less,” said Ryan Fournier, a communications adviser to Smith.

“We believe this conversation is a vital step towards a fairer Confederation.”

The Canadian Press reached out to premiers across the country to ask whether they supported Smith’s proposals, but many did not respond to repeated requests.

Some, such as Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe’s office, said they wouldn’t be commenting, and those who did respond didn’t answer directly.

“This is a matter for Albertans to consider through their referendum process,” said a spokesperson for Northwest Territories Premier R.J. Simpson.

Nunavut Premier John Main said the territory is be closely monitoring the results of the referendum.

“Like Alberta, Nunavut is rich in resources that benefit the rest of Canada and the world, and we need external supports to bring those resources to market,” Main said.

“We intend to make our mark in partnership with other governments and private industry, and support measures that build a stronger Canada.”

Yukon Premier Currie Dixon said he looked forward to “hearing what Albertans have to say” when it comes to the Constitution, but didn’t offer an opinion.

He did, however, voice his support for Alberta remaining in Canada, referring to the headlining question on succession.

“While I know Albertans have a number of grievances with the federal government, it’s my hope that Alberta will continue to stay in Confederation,” Dixon said.

“Canada, including the Yukon, would be negatively affected if Alberta were to leave.”

While they may not be saying so now, one constitutional law expert said Smith’s office is correct in saying there could be enough support from other provincial governments to take two of the proposals beyond the ballot — having provinces pick provincial judges and opting out of federal programs without financial punishment.

“It’s extra provincial power. Why wouldn’t they want it?” said Gerard Kennedy, a constitutional law professor at the University of Alberta.

“To me, the big problem is going to be getting the federal Parliament to agree, because the federal government would have to be agreeing to reduce its own power for nothing in return.”

Smith, Moe, Ontario Premier Doug Ford and former Quebec premier François Legault penned a letter to Ottawa in March asking that all provincial Appeal Court and Superior Court judges be appointed from a pre-approved list submitted by the provinces.

Federal Justice Minister Sean Fraser quickly shut the issue down, saying Ottawa wasn’t considering changes to the judicial appointment process. He pointed to the advisory committees set up across the country that review and advise on judicial applications to say that provinces already have input, since each government appoints some of the committee’s members.

Kennedy said the proposal about giving provincial laws paramountcy over federal laws probably won’t go anywhere, adding that there was no federation in the world with that setup.

He said regardless of the support that may exist, Alberta could be opening a can of worms if it makes serious efforts at working with other provinces.

“The problem if you open up constitutional negotiations is that some other provinces are going to have their pet projects and they’ll say, ‘well, we won’t agree to amend the Constitution on terms favorable to Alberta unless they’re also amended on terms that are favorable to New Brunswick or Quebec,'” he said.

“And then you end up having a package and too many provinces won’t like some part of the package and then it doesn’t get through.”

He said there’s a third way Alberta could try to amend the Constitution.

Some changes can be made with only the support of Parliament and the province that is being affected by the amendment. An example was in 2001, when the Constitution was amended to change the name of Newfoundland to Newfoundland and Labrador.

Alberta could try to go that route, Kennedy said, but the effort would likely end up in court, as granting the province special privileges others don’t have would go against the presumption that all provinces are treated equally.

Despite the premier and her office hinting that they’re committed to lobbying other provinces should the four proposals get majority approval on Oct. 19, some doubt Smith is willing to put in the effort.

Smith framed her referendum questions as presenting Albertans with a plan to better the province’s standing within Confederation so that voters don’t resort to separatism. She’s also blamed federal immigration policy for Alberta’s overburdened health and education systems.

Calgary-based political scientist Duane Bratt said the constitutional questions feel like an afterthought for the referendum.

Bratt said he’d feel differently if the questions were a bigger part of the premier’s messaging or the government’s $4-million ad campaign, which he said are far more focused on Smith’s five immigration proposals that are also on the ballot.

“She’s not really talking about the Constitutional questions,” Bratt said in an interview, pointing to recent speeches the premier has made.

“It’s immigrants who are the scapegoats and the villains here.”

Bratt, a professor at Mount Royal University, said the lack of attention Smith has given the constitutional proposals, combined with the amount of work needed to actually move the issues forward, means he doesn’t think she will act after Oct. 19.

“Where is their energy? Is their energy (on) building pipelines, restructuring the health-care system, or constitutional change? Because I don’t think they could do all of that.”

Opposition NDP Leader Naheed Nenshi said this week that he thinks Smith is only trying to find new enemies to blame for Alberta getting a raw deal.

“She doesn’t want to get those things,” Nenshi told reporters Tuesday about the Constitution reforms.

“She wants to complain about not getting those things.

“She wants the other provinces to say no.”

© 2026 The Canadian Press

You May Also Like

Top Stories